Ascent Petrochem Holdings Co., Limited
Articles
Articles

Articles

Liquid Deicer Brine Use in Asphalt Surface Scaling Prevention

Liquid deicer brines are applied to asphalt surfaces as pre-storm anti-icing agents, as pre-wetting liquids for solid deicing chemicals, and as direct deicing agents when light frost or black ice is present. Sodium chloride brine at a concentration of 23.3 wt% has a eutectic freezing point of −21.1°C and a density near 1.18 g/cm³ at 20°C. The fluid is sprayed at rates between 10 gal/lane mile and 40 gal/lane mile, leaving a thin liquid film that prevents ice crystals from bonding to asphalt mastic. In dense-graded asphalt mixtures with air void contents between 3% and 6%, the brine remains primarily in surface macrotexture and does not rapidly fill the interconnected void network. Repeated dilution by precipitation, evaporation of water, and refreezing can nevertheless generate a freeze–thaw cycle at exposed aggregate tips. The resulting cyclic stress, combined with mechanical abrasion from steel plow blades and studded tires, is a primary initiator of asphalt surface scaling. Scaling in this context refers to progressive loss of fine aggregate and mastic from the wearing surface, not structural disintegration of the asphalt layer. The presence of a liquid deicer changes the thermal and osmotic environment at the mastic–aggregate interface, and the material response therefore differs from untreated freeze–thaw exposure. The clinical objective of brine use in asphalt scaling prevention is not to chemically harden the asphalt but to reduce ice-bond strength so that plowing requires lower mechanical force and repeated scraping is minimized. Published guidance in NCHRP Report 577 recognizes application rate control as a central variable in maintaining deicing service while limiting surface damage.

Why Does Mechanical Abrasion Under Ice Removal Trigger Asphalt Surface Scaling?

Scaling initiation on asphalt surfaces under winter maintenance is dominated by shear failure at the mastic–aggregate interface rather than by compressive crushing of aggregate. When ice bonds to exposed aggregate particles on a wearing course, a plow blade or scraper must transmit sufficient horizontal force to shear the ice–asphalt bond. The force is transferred into the mastic as a tensile stress at the contact line of each aggregate particle. Asphalt binders become increasingly brittle as temperature decreases; a performance-graded binder designated as PG 64-22 may retain sufficient viscoelastic relaxation at −10°C but can lose much of that capacity at −22°C, near its low-temperature continuous grade. If the applied stress exceeds the local cohesive strength of the mastic or the adhesive bond strength between mastic and aggregate, fine particles are extracted from the surface. This extraction is observed as scaling and raveling. The presence of a liquid deicer brine lowers the freezing point of water in surface voids and can maintain a partially liquid phase at temperatures where untreated moisture would be solid ice. The partially liquid phase transmits hydraulic pressure under wheel loads, similar to the pore-pressure mechanism in portland cement concrete scaling described by ASTM C672, although no equivalent asphalt-specific scaling standard exists. Laboratory moisture damage testing under AASHTO T 283 uses a freeze–thaw conditioning cycle and indirect tensile strength measurement, with a commonly specified tensile strength ratio minimum of 0.80. Asphalt mixtures with TSR values below 0.70 after conditioning are generally considered moisture-susceptible and require a liquid antistripping agent or hydrated lime. Published field data correlating brine-specific scaling with TSR results is limited; agencies therefore augment TSR with visual raveling surveys and aggregate pop-out counts on test sections. The operational risk is greatest on open-graded friction courses and chip seals because the bitumen film thickness on coarse aggregate is typically below 8 μm, and surface-connected air void contents commonly exceed 12%. Under those conditions, brine can penetrate more readily to the aggregate–binder interface and reduce adhesive bond capacity over repeated cycles.

Calibration Standards for Brine Pumping and Spray Reticulation Systems

Application uniformity on asphalt surfaces depends on pump flow stability, spray bar height, nozzle spacing, nozzle orientation, and ground-speed compensation. Positive displacement pumps on municipal anti-icing trucks are commonly specified to deliver between 5 gal/min and 50 gal/min at a discharge pressure of 40 psi to 100 psi. Flowmeters used with these pumps are frequently calibrated with water, but a 23.3 wt% sodium chloride brine has a density approximately 18% higher than water and a slightly higher dynamic viscosity, which alters the mass flow rate for a given volumetric setpoint. Calibration records from state DOT maintenance facilities document volumetric application rate errors of up to 10% when water-calibrated flowmeters are used without a density correction. Nozzle clogging is a recurring failure mode when brine is stored in unheated tanks below −15°C and recrystallized salt crystals accumulate at nozzle orifices. Spray bar systems with pulse-width modulated solenoid valves and radar ground-speed feedback maintain application rates within ± 5% of target when calibrated at both 40 psi and 60 psi setpoints. The spray bar height must be adjusted to produce a triple-overlap pattern at the pavement surface; for nozzles spaced at 20 in with 65° fan angles, a bar height of 18 in to 20 in is typical, but specific nozzle manufacturer data should govern. Uneven transverse distribution results in alternating bands of excess brine and untreated asphalt, which creates local differences in ice adhesion and differential freeze–thaw distress. On open-graded asphalt courses with high surface texture, droplet size must be controlled to avoid rapid runoff into interconnected voids; nozzles producing a volume median diameter below 150 μm are generally prone to drift and should be avoided in windy conditions above 15 mph. Density and viscosity corrections should be rechecked whenever the brine concentration changes by more than 2 wt%, because the flow coefficient of fixed-orifice nozzles is concentration-dependent under field conditions.

Pre-wetting solid sodium chloride with a compatible liquid brine is a standard winter maintenance practice for reducing particle bounce and scatter from asphalt surfaces. The liquid film changes the single-particle impact mechanics, causing solid salt granules to adhere to the road surface instead of rebounding into the ditch or onto the shoulder. Agencies commonly specify a pre-wet rate of 8 gal/ton to 12 gal/ton of dry rock salt for high-speed application at truck speeds between 25 mph and 40 mph. The use of pre-wet salt reduces the total mass of solid salt required for a given level of ice-control service; published agency reports describe salt reductions in the range of 20% to 30% compared with dry salt application, although controlled experimental data for this specific configuration is limited. The reduced salt mass and lower plowing frequency decrease the mechanical abrasion load on the asphalt surface, which is a direct contribution to scaling prevention. Pre-wetting must be matched to the ambient temperature and the brine composition: calcium chloride brine should not be used as a pre-wet for sodium chloride at temperatures below −18°C because the mixed chloride system can form a viscous slush that resists uniform spread. The pre-wet liquid should be stored at a concentration above its eutectic so that it does not freeze in the manifold or nozzle. For sodium chloride, that storage concentration is typically 23.3 wt%; for calcium chloride, storage concentrations near 30 wt% are common and have a published freezing point below −50°C. Field maintenance records indicate that pre-wetting is most effective when the liquid is injected at the spinner disk rather than sprayed directly onto the salt pile in the hopper, because direct pile spraying can produce uneven liquid distribution and clumping before the material reaches the roadway.

When Magnesium Chloride Brine Residuals Become Problematic in Asphalt Fines

Magnesium chloride brine is used when lower freezing point depression is required than sodium chloride, but its persistence on asphalt surfaces creates a different risk set. A 30 wt% magnesium chloride solution has a published freezing point of approximately −33°C and a deliquescence relative humidity near 33% at 25°C. The deliquescence behavior means that the brine absorbs moisture from air at relative humidities commonly present on pavement surfaces after a winter storm, maintaining a liquid film even when no additional precipitation occurs. In dense-graded asphalt, this liquid film is largely confined to surface macrotexture; in open-graded mixes with air void contents above 12%, capillary action can draw the liquid into surface-connected voids and bring it into prolonged contact with the mastic–aggregate interface. The prolonged wet condition can accelerate emulsification of moisture-sensitive binders and is one mechanism for fine aggregate loss and scaling. Magnesium chloride brine should not be applied to new asphalt overlays placed within the previous 6 to 12 months, because incomplete binder curing and high permeability increase the likelihood of brine penetration. It should also be avoided where the asphalt mixture has a tensile strength ratio below 0.80 under AASHTO T 283, because the material already has reduced resistance to moisture-induced damage. Pavement sections with positive crossfall above 2% and no ponding zones are preferred for magnesium chloride brine use. Published data for MgCl2-specific asphalt scaling in controlled laboratory conditions is limited; the available field evidence relates primarily to increase in retained surface moisture rather than direct chemical attack on bitumen. Operators using magnesium chloride brine should also monitor pump seals and steel tank linings because the chloride solution is corrosive to carbon steel components at concentrations above 25 wt%.

Freeze–Thaw Response of Dense-Graded Asphalt Treated with Anti-Icing Brines

Dense-graded asphalt mixtures respond to brine-related freeze–thaw cycles through a combination of binder embrittlement, adhesive bond degradation, and pore-pressure generation. In compacted specimens with 4% air voids, the air void system is not fully interconnected; the brine penetrates only the upper 2 mm to 4 mm of the specimen under short-term immersion. Repeated wetting and drying cycles at the surface can produce a gradient in mastic stiffness, with the surface layer becoming stiffer than the underlying mixture. This stiffness gradient concentrates shear strain at the interface between the affected and unaffected layers and can initiate surface cracking that later contributes to scaling. The standard moisture susceptibility protocol in AASHTO T 283 specifies vacuum saturation followed by a freeze cycle at −18°C and a thaw cycle at 60°C. The test uses distilled water, not brine; therefore, the colligative properties of the deicer are not fully reproduced. Some agencies modify the protocol by substituting a 23.3 wt% sodium chloride brine during the saturation step, but published data for this modification is limited and inter-laboratory reproducibility is not established. Indirect tensile strength ratio values below 0.80 are widely used as a trigger for adding an antistripping agent or lime in high-traffic dense-graded mixes. For brine-treated surfaces, visual assessment of scaling includes counting aggregate pop-outs per square yard over two winter seasons. No ASTM standard currently addresses asphalt surface scaling directly; the closest analog is ASTM C672 for concrete surfaces, and its use on asphalt is not recommended because the failure mechanisms differ. The absence of a standard asphalt scaling test means that quantitative field comparison requires project-specific baseline sections and repeated laser texture or sand patch testing according to ASTM E965.

Test methodDesignationMetricTypical acceptance criterion
Moisture-induced damageAASHTO T 283 / ASTM D4867Tensile strength ratio0.80
Boiling water strippingASTM D3625Visual retained coatingNo significant stripping
Surface macrotexture depthASTM E965Mean texture depth0.8 mm to 1.5 mm for wearing courses
Portland cement concrete scaling referenceASTM C672Visual ratingNot applicable to asphalt

At pavement surface temperatures between −7°C and −12°C, direct application of a 23.3 wt% sodium chloride brine produces a saturated solution layer that can melt light frost and prevent ice bonding without saturating the asphalt void network. Below −12°C, the melting rate becomes impractically slow for sodium chloride brine unless the application rate is increased or a lower-eutectic calcium chloride brine is substituted. Calcium chloride brine at 30 wt% has a published freezing point below −50°C, but its deliquescence relative humidity near 29% at 25°C creates a more persistent liquid film than sodium chloride. The operational boundary for asphalt scaling prevention is defined by pavement temperature, precipitation type, and pavement age. Application is typically contraindicated when the pavement surface temperature is above 25°C without precipitation, because rapid evaporation leaves solid salt crystals that can be over-concentrated in surface depressions. Application on newly placed asphalt overlays should follow the curing period specified by the agency, commonly 6 to 12 months, before chloride brines are used. Surfaces with visible aggregate pop-out, open surface cracks, or sand patch mean texture depths above 1.5 mm are particularly vulnerable to brine penetration and should not receive repeated applications until surface treatment is completed. For dense-graded asphalt with adequate drainage and TSR values above 0.80, sodium chloride brine at pre-storm rates between 10 gal/lane mile and 40 gal/lane mile is considered acceptable practice for scaling prevention. The use of magnesium chloride and calcium chloride brines on porous asphalt or chip seals is not recommended without site-specific monitoring because their hygroscopic residual films can prolong pavement wetness and increase the risk of mastic loss.

Related Articles